Legal Opinion
In re Ellard
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Motion for an order requiring the Mount Morris Bank of ISTew York to pay applicants the amount with interest named in a certain certificate of deposit.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
The petitioners move for an order requiring the Mount Morris Bank of New York to pay them the amount, jvith interest, named in a certificate of deposit *375issued and delivered by the bank to them. The certificate provides as follows:
“ No. 12,730.
“ Mount Morris Bank of the City of New York.
“New York, January 10th, 1908.
“ $26,438.03. John Ellard has deposited in this bank twenty-six thousand four hundred and thirty-eight 03-100 dollars, payable to the order of John or Margaret Ellard on the return of this certificate properly indorsed, with 3v,- per cent, interest, if held until April 1st, 1908.”
“…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Zander v. New York Security & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- In re CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Farmers' Bank of Saratoga Co. v. MaxwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trellsite Foundry & Stamping Co. v. Enterprise FoundryMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Beveridge v. BaerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Pulaski County v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Trellsite Foundry & Stamping Co. v. Enterprise FoundryMichigan Supreme Court · 1961