Kuetbach v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeals from judgments of tbe circuit court for Dane county: E. Eay SteveNs, Circuit Judge. Both of the above entitled actions arise out of the same accident and they will therefore be treated together. Claim for compensation for accidental death.
Read the full summary
Appeals from judgments of tbe circuit court for Dane county: E. Eay SteveNs, Circuit Judge. Both of the above entitled actions arise out of the same accident and they will therefore be treated together. Claim for compensation for accidental death. The deceased, Ferdinand Kuetbach, Jr., on and prior to December 19, 1915, the date of the accident, was in the employ of the defendant 'Washington Outlery Company, and living with his father, Ferdinand Kuetbach, 8r., who was dependent upon him for support. Prior to this time, as a result of illicit intimate relations between the deceased and the…
1Opinion of the CourtRoseNbeeut, J.
By stipulation of the parties the issue in the cases, which it was agreed should be tried and heard together both in this and in the circuit court, is narrowed so as to present one question, to wit, the construction of sub. 3, 4, and 5 of sec. 2394 — 10, Stats., which are as follows:
“3. The following shall be conclusively presumed to be solely and wholly dependent for support upon a deceased employee :
“(a) A wife upon a husband with whom she is living at the time of his death.
“(b) A husband upon a wife with whom he is living at the time of her death.
“(c) A child or children under the age of…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Beausoleil's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Dahlquist v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.