Legal Opinion

United States v. Dahan

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 4, 2005No. CV 02-5753 SVW (PJWx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT SUA SPONTE.

WILSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION/FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case arises out of a dispute over whether a student attending Duke University on an NROTC scholarship who was denied a commission after graduating is required to reimburse the United States for the scholarship under the terms of his “NROTC Scholarship Service Agreement.” Defendant was notified that he owed the United States reimbursement and failed to pay, alleging that the terms of the contract…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Angeles v. JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API