Legal Opinion

Ibanez v. Hines Interests Limited Partnership

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 17, 2024No. 1:21-cv-04336Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHELLE INEZ IBANEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 21 C 4336 v. ) ) Judge Virginia M. Kendall HINES INTERESTS LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP and JEFFREY C. HINES, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER While working for Defendant Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“HILP”) as a concierge, Plaintiff Michelle Inez Ibanez claims she suffered various forms of discrimination. HILP now moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. 34). Because Ibanez’s employment- discrimination claims are time-barred, HILP’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API