Legal Opinion

Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 7, 2003No. Slip Op. 03-148; Court 02-00705PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum & Order

AQUILINO, Judge.

The amended complaint filed herein on behalf of the above-encaptioned plaintiff, the corporate name of which its counsel have compressed to “KICC”, contests denial by the U.S. Customs Service 1 of classification of certain ceramic substrates for integrated circuits (“IC substrates”) under subheading 8542.90.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (“Electronic integrated circuits and microassemblies; parts thereof: ... Parts”). The defendant interposed an answer thereto, and its counsel have now filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atari Caribe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  2. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  3. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API