Legal Opinion

United States v. Woods

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 12, 2018No. 16-221 (L)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

16-221 (L) United States v. Woods et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API