Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Misemer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 1994No. 93-772PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellants, Phyllis V. Williamson and Glenda Haney, appeal a decision of the Lonoke County Chancery Court finding that, under a subdivision’s covenants and restrictions, they may keep no more than four dogs on their lot and must remove tarps from structures, modify a travel trailer, and maintain a daily and nightly presence on the property. In his order, however, the chancellor failed to rule upon the appellants’ counterclaim or upon the appellees’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim. Unfortunately, the record is silent on the question of the disposition of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Smith v. LeonardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dodge v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Maroney v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. City of Corning v. CochranSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Richardson v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Stockton v. Sentry InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API