Dillard v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Chief Judge.
James Wayne Dillard (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. 1 Movant alleges his guilty plea was involuntary because he was not advised of his right to file a motion to suppress and his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the charges against him. We affirm.
Movant was charged by Felony Complaint with production of a controlled substance, Section 195.211.3; possession of a motor vehicle with altered identification number, Section 301.390; and receiving stolen property, Section 570.080.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- West v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Thurman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Woodson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007