Legal Opinion

Dillard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2004No. 25539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Chief Judge.

James Wayne Dillard (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. 1 Movant alleges his guilty plea was involuntary because he was not advised of his right to file a motion to suppress and his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the charges against him. We affirm.

Movant was charged by Felony Complaint with production of a controlled substance, Section 195.211.3; possession of a motor vehicle with altered identification number, Section 301.390; and receiving stolen property, Section 570.080.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Thurman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Woodson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API