Legal Opinion

Woodson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2007No. 27504PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.

James L. Woodson (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file a written motion for continuance, failing to make a punctual review of the State’s discovery, and failing to suppress a witness identification of Movant. We affirm.

We affirmed Movant’s convictions on direct appeal in State v. Woodson, 140 S.W.3d 621 (Mo.App. S.D.2004). We recite facts from that opinion without further citation.

On August 19, 1999, Shannon Shipman (“Shannon”) and his brother,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Anderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. WoodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. EoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blair v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API