Legal Opinion
Konewko v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 5, 1988No. 2—88—0344, 2—88—0362 consPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn
Defendants, Kidder, Peabody and Co., Inc. (Kidder), Blunt, Ellis & Loewi, Inc. (BEL), and Thaddeus Augelli, appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Du Page County denying their motion to compel arbitration of the present dispute. On appeal, defendants contend that the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C.A. §1 et seq. (West 1970)) applies in this case and that the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. We vacate and remand with directions.
On August 4, 1987, the plaintiffs, Edward and Genevieve Konewko, filed an 11-count complaint against the defendants in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kostakos v. KSN Joint Venture No. 1Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Cencula v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Kress Corp. v. Edw. C. Levy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bishop v. We Care Hair Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Cigna Healthcare of St. Louis, Inc. v. Timothy N. KaiserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Aste v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Johnson v. BaumgardtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Oddmund Grundstad v. Joseph RittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.