Legal Opinion
Laveck v. Pascoe Pizza, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 16, 1990No. 89-P-421PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
None of four points which the defendants now press was properly called to the attention of the trial judge and those issues are, therefore, lost on appeal. Mass.R.Civ.P. 51(b), 365 Mass. 816 (1974). Trustees of Stigma-tine Fathers, Inc. v. Secretary of Admin. & Fin., 369 Mass. 562, 565 (1976). Collins v. Baron, 392 Mass. 565, 568 n.3 (1984). Narkin v. Springfield, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 489, 491 (1977). A fifth point, conceded by the plaintiff, requires only a relatively minor adjustment in the judgment.
An afternoon and evening of steady drinking by driver and passengers culminated in a car…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Trustees of the Stigmatine Fathers, Inc. v. Secretary of Administration & FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Narkin v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ELM Medical Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Mitchell v. Hastings & Koch Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Shantigar Foundation v. Bear Mountain BuildersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Woods v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.