Legal Opinion
Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1991No. 83 Civ. 5401 (RPP)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendant John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Hancock”) moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Agreed Statement of Facts stipulated by the parties on November 23, 1988 (hereinafter “A.S.F. ¶_”) to dismiss the remaining claims of plaintiffs amended complaint. By its opinion and order dated September 26, 1989, this Court dismissed plaintiffs claim asserted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”). This motion relates to plaintiffs contract…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hunt Ltd. v. Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Francisco L. Borges, Treasurer of the State of Connecticut, and State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Harris Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Granite Partners, LP v. Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Kottler v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Former Trustee of the Sperry Master Retirement Trust No. 2 (And Its Successor, the Unisys Master Trust) and the Bank of New York, as Trustee of the Unisys Master Trust v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Sperry Corporation and the Retirement Committee of Sperry Corporation, Third-Party Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Arp Films, Inc., Amerex Films, Inc., and Claude S. Hill, Cross-Appellees v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.