Druckenmiller v. Kuzenski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
This is an action in trespass for conversion of articles of personal property. The plaintiff obtained a verdict. Defendant appealed after the dismissal of his motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. The principal question for our determination is whether there was a conversion of the articles.
The facts of the case are that plaintiff carried on a tombstone business on defendant’s premises, on which plaintiff had erected a frame building 20 feet by 24 feet. On May 1, 1946 the parties entered into a written ' agreement of sale for one acre of defendant’s ground,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berry v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Watts v. LehmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Louis Bernstein v. J.M. HinemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- McKay v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joseph C. Baram v. Robert Farugia, Glenn S. Hackett and Dennis Fredella, Robert Farugia and Glenn S. HackettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Universal Computer Systems, Inc. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- A & J Solomon Wrecking Co. v. Raymond Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970