Legal Opinion

Druckenmiller v. Kuzenski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeal, 277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is an action in trespass for conversion of articles of personal property. The plaintiff obtained a verdict. Defendant appealed after the dismissal of his motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. The principal question for our determination is whether there was a conversion of the articles.

The facts of the case are that plaintiff carried on a tombstone business on defendant’s premises, on which plaintiff had erected a frame building 20 feet by 24 feet. On May 1, 1946 the parties entered into a written ' agreement of sale for one acre of defendant’s ground,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berry v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Watts v. LehmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Louis Bernstein v. J.M. HinemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. McKay v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph C. Baram v. Robert Farugia, Glenn S. Hackett and Dennis Fredella, Robert Farugia and Glenn S. HackettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Universal Computer Systems, Inc. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. A & J Solomon Wrecking Co. v. Raymond Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API