Legal Opinion
Berry v. Heinel Motors, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 6, 1947No. Appeal, 131PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ross, J.,
In this trespass action brought by tenants against their landlord for conversion of trade fixtures left on the leased premises after the expiration of the term, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs. After the defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and new trial were refused by the court below, the defendant took this appeal only from the lower court’s refusal of a new trial.
The plaintiffs conducted an automobile sales agency on premises at 4223 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, which were occupied by them under a four-year lease which expired on September 15,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thompson v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Hill v. SewaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- McClintock & Irvine Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Lindsay Bros. v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- First National Bank v. ReeseCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- American Enka Company, in No. 82-1080 v. Wicaco MacHine Corp. American Enka Company v. Wicaco MacHine Corp., in No. 82-1109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Joseph C. Baram v. Robert Farugia, Glenn S. Hackett and Dennis Fredella, Robert Farugia and Glenn S. HackettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Carl P. Wagner v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Kenworthy v. BurghartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Northcraft v. Edward C. Michener Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.