Legal Opinion

Louis Bernstein v. J.M. Hineman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1925No. Appeal 98PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The plaintiff being the owner of a used Studebaker truck placed it in the custody of the defendant for repairs; the latter having a garage and iautomobile repair shop. The repairs were made; whereupon the plaintiff was notified of the fact and demand was made for payment. The plaintiff neglected or refused to pay the repair bill and thereupon, as alleged, he was notified that unless payment was made the truck would be sold for the recovery of the amount of the bill. Soon afterward the defendant sold the truck to one Rose. No notice of the sale was given by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Croft v. JenningsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Rodgers v. GrotheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Davis & Pugh v. Bigler & SonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Etter v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parks v. Mr. FordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. B. Cohen & Sons Caterers, Inc. v. New Plan Realty Trust (In Re B. Cohen & Sons Caterers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Smyth v. Fidel. Dep. Co. of Md.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Parks v. " MR. FORD"District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Druckenmiller v. KuzenskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API