Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Flanagan

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 1990No. CA 89-338PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

Jerry and Mildred Hicks appeal from a decree of the Crawford County Chancery Court quieting appellees’ title to a disputed strip of land. We find sufficient merit in one aspect of the appeal to warrant modification and affirm the decree as modified.

The parties are adjoining property owners. Appellees Flanagan own lots three and four of Block AD, Galloway Addition to the City of Alma. Appellees Smith are in possession of this property and are purchasing it from the Flanagans under an installment land contract. Appellants own lots five and eight, the first of which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Epps v. RagsdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Terral v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. City of Fort Smith v. McKibbinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. Davis v. BurfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Rye v. BaumannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Moses v. DautartasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Robertson v. LeesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Walker v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Tolson v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API