Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Primelending
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 16, 2011No. 10-1250PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice.
|, This case involves a question of law certified to this court by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in accordance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-8 (2010) and accepted by this court on December 16, 2010. See Gibbs v. Primelending, 2010 Ark. 503, 2010 WL 5185466. The question certified is “[w]hether the use of the conspiracy theory of in personam jurisdiction violates Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-4-101.” We answer in the negative.
The following facts were provided in the federal district court’s certification order. In…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yanmar Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Tricarichi v. Cooperative Rabobank, U.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Raser Tech. v. Morgan StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Beason v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- State ex rel.Third-Party Health Plansand Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas,Inc.vs.Shawn D. NinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.