Legal Opinion
State ex rel.Third-Party Health Plansand Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas,Inc.vs.Shawn D. Nines
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 2020No. 20-0296& 20-0297Separate
1Opinion of the Court
No. 20-0296 – State ex rel. Third-Party Defendant Health Plans, et. al. v. The Honorable Shawn D. Nines, et al. and No. 20-0297 – State ex rel. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. v. The Honorable Shawn D. Nines FILED November 25, 2020 Hutchison, Justice, dissenting: EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. I believe that sufficient allegations were asserted that the foreign third-party-defendant “Blues” had a contractual arrangement with Highmark of West Virginia (“Highmark”), such that Highmark was acting as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.