Legal Opinion

Manzo v. Estep

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1997No. 45A04-9703-CV-108PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs-Appellants Jessica Manzo (Jessica), Gerald Manzo and Patty Manzo appeal their award of damages by the jury.

We reverse and remand for a new trial only as to damages that are directly attributable to this accident.

ISSUE

Plaintiffs present one issue for our review which we restate as: whether the jury award of zero dollars ($0) in damages is inadequate.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 21,1993, the automobile driven by the Plaintiff-Appellant, Jessica Manzo, was rear-ended by the automobile driven by the Defendant-Appellee, Aimee Estep.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coy v. Indianapolis Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Prange v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Barrow v. TalbottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Cox v. WinklepleckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. State v. TablerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Centennial Mortgage, Inc. v. BlumenfeldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Walker v. CuppettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Services, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Russell v. Neumann-SteadmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Neher v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API