Legal Opinion

Neher v. Hobbs

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 2001No. 92A04-0008-CV-316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Amy Neher appeals the trial court's grant of a Motion to Correct Errors in favor of Gregory and Emma Hobbs setting aside the jury verdicts and ordering a new trial in the Hobbs' action against Neher. We reverse and remand with instructions.

Issues1

Neher raises the following restated issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court's special findings of fact sufficiently complied with the requirements of Trial Rule 59(J)(7); and

2. Whether the damage award was inadequate, thereby warranting a new trial pursuant to Trial Rule 59(J)(7).

Facts and Procedural History. The facts…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Goldsberry v. GrubbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Kimberlin v. DeLongIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Prange v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Barrow v. TalbottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Carmel v. Leeper Electric Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Neher v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Neher v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API