Legal Opinion

duPont Glore Forgan Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 29, 1975No. 73 Civ. 2447PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

This action originally was instituted by six named plaintiffs,1 who also sought class action certification on be*483half of all other Centrex users similarly situated, against the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT&T”) and its twenty-three operating telephone company subsidiaries.2 constituting and known as the Bell System. Centrex Service is a form of telephone service used by large business and other organizations. This type of “private communication service” was exempted from federal communication excise taxes by the Excise Tax Reduction Act of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Bodner v. Banque ParibasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  3. American Communications Ass'n v. Retirement Plan for Employees of RCA Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  4. In re Victor Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
  5. In re Glassine & Greaseproof Paper Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API