Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of C.D.N.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1997No. C0-96-1227, C2-96-1228PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, two juveniles adjudicated delinquent for committing criminal sexual conduct allege that mandatory registration as predatory sexual offenders violates their due process rights because, although registration is an adult sanction, appellants were not given the right to a jury trial. We affirm but invite the legislature to review the mandatory application of the registration statute to juveniles.
FACTS
Appellant C.D.N. was charged with one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. The petition alleged that when C.D.N. was 11 years old,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Richard A.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-PetitionerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- In Re the Welfare of J.C.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. C.M.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.