Legal Opinion

Kearney v. Mallon Suburban Motors, Inc.

New Jersey Circuit Court

Decided February 14, 1945PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William A. Smith, C. C. J.

This action is one instituted by the plaintiff to Tecoyer on two counts; the first count being an action for malicious prosecution and the second count being an action alleging a conspiracy to maliciously prosecute.

Motion was made before me for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complainant is barred by the statute of limitations, in that the cause of action arose on a refusal *84by the grand jury to indict on the complaint alleged to have been maliciously prosecuted by a vote taken on April 30th, 1943, and that the suit was not instituted within two years…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tomlin v. HildrethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. Hammill v. MacK International Motor Truck Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. Lowe v. WartmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1885
  4. Crane v. KetchamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Dailey v. KiernanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. McGrogan v. TillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Canessa v. Kislak, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Rumbauskas v. CantorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Gray v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API