Legal Opinion

Caul v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 19, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1243Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES L. CAUL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 15-1243 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. CAPITOL POLICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, James Caul, brings this action against his employer, United States Capitol Police (“USCP” or “defendant”), pursuant to the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA”),

2 U.S.C. §§ 1401

et seq., asserting two claims for unlawful racial discrimination and retaliation. Am. Compl. (Preamble), ECF No. 4. The plaintiff claims that his supervisors “depriv[ed] [him] of overtime [] assignments based on…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API