Legal Opinion

Lerner Stores Corporation v. Lerner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1947No. 11347PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant seeks to enjoin appellee from using the name “Lerner” in ihe title of his store in San Jose, alleging that by such use of said name appellee is indulging in unfair competition.

Appellant, at the time of the commencement of this action, was operating 181 stores located in 41 states and the District of Columbia. Each store is designated as “Lerner Shops” by a sign extending across the front, and printed on price tags, boxes, hags and sales slips. The stores are not advertised in newspapers, magazines, or over the radio. The historical background of appellant, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
  3. Sweet Sixteen Co. v. Sweet "16" Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Eastern Outfitting Co. v. ManheimWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Lighting Co. v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Florence A. Pike v. Ruby Foo's Den, Inc., of Maryland, a CoprorationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  5. Palmer v. Gulf Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API