Legal Opinion

Opperud v. Bussey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1935No. 23310PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal involves an attorney’s lien claimed by the plaintiffs in error, M. L. Opperud and O. B. Martin, who are practicing attorneys and represented the defendant in error, Telee Bussey, the plaintiff in the original action which they filed for her in the district court of Kay county, Okla., for divorce and alimony.

There is no dispute as to the facts. The said plaintiff, now defendant in error, agreed with said attorneys when she employed them that they should receive 12% per cent, of whatever amount was awarded her by the judgment of said court, together with whatever fees might be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Jordan v. WestermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hamilton v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. McConnell v. McConnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tisdale v. Wheeler Bros. Grain Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. McCarthy v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. In Re the Proceedings for the Discipline of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Barelli v. LevinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API