Legal Opinion

Wittman v. Crooke

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 1998No. 769, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

Janice Wittman, appellant, owns 300 shares of stock in the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE). 1 On September 25, 1995, BGE announced that it had entered into a merger agreement with the Potomac Electric Power Company (PEP-CO). In the Circuit Court for Baltimore County on that same day, appellant filed a complaint against BGE’s board of directors, appellees, alleging that they had breached their duty of care and their duty of loyalty by approving the merger with PEPCO. Appellant’s claims were based on the theory that, since each director stood a chance of being named…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  3. Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
  4. Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. BaronSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Papalexiou v. Tower West CondominiumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Froelich v. EricksonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  2. Danielewicz v. ArnoldCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Garcia v. Foulger Pratt Development, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Matson v. Alpert (In re LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  5. Storetrax.com, Inc. v. GurlandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API