Goddard v. Frazier
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAII, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the constitutionality of Section 3 of Public Law 116, 79th Congress, Chap. 223, 59 Stat. 313, designed to retroactively cure defects in Indian land titles resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Hellard, 322 U.S. 363, 64 S.Ct. 985, 88 L.Ed. 1326. In that case it was held, under facts not materially different from ours, that in view of the large governmental interests in restricted Indian lands, the United States was a necessary party to a proceedings in the state court to partition restricted Indian lands under Section 2…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. Heinszen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Temple University--Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Goes v. FeldmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- De Martino v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. FarrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.