Legal Opinion · Dissent
Honulik v. Town of Greenwich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 13, 2009No. SC 18046Published
1Dissent
KATZ, J., with whom ROGERS, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE, J.,
join, dissenting. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that the 1999-2004 collective bargaining agreement (agreement) between the named defendant, the town of Greenwich (town),1 and the Silver Shield Association, *727Inc., the union representing the town’s police officers (union), required the candidate ranked first on the promotional list to be promoted to the position of police captain, a position outside the bargaining unit. The majority answers that question in the negative on the basis of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Michigan Family Resources, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union Local 517mCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.