Legal Opinion

Karl Kapanke, Universal Am-Can, Ltd., and M.C. Schmitt Trucking, Inc. v. James Stovall and Tracy Stovall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2012No. 45A03-1201-CT-12Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before FILED Dec 26 2012, 9:39 am any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. CLERK of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: RENEE J. MORTIMER ADAM J. SEDIA SCOTT B. COCKRUM Rubino, Ruman, Crosmer & Polen Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Dyer, Indiana Schererville, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA KARL KAPANKE, UNIVERSAL AM-CAN, ) LTD., and M.C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Speybroeck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Bennett v. RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Simmons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Dawson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Sibbing v. CaveIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API