Legal Opinion

Hillman v. O'Hearne

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 17, 1955No. 3719PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, District Judge.

Sidney Hillman and Leonard Hillman, attorneys at law, seek a review of the action of the deputy commissioner in fixing $200 as their fee for services rendered *218to the claimant, William F. Crampton, in a proceeding under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., instead of the $500 which they requested.

They allege that the deputy commissioner “erred in properly evaluating the said attorneys’ services to the claimant”, aver that “the efforts and services of the said attorneys should be properly and substantially compensated”, and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Di Costanzo v. WillardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
  2. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. TraynorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
  3. Linnell, Choate & Webber v. HeydeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1971
  4. Myers v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API