Legal Opinion
Di Costanzo v. Willard
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 9, 1958No. Civ. 18631PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The petitioner has brought this action to review a compensation order made by the respondent in a proceeding under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, in which the petitioner’s client, Ralph Scotto, was claimant, Bull Insular Line, Inc. was the employer, and the Travelers Insurance Company was the insurance carrier. Review of that order is sought insofar as it fixed as the gross sum of $175 the fee of this petitioner for the legal services which he had rendered to the claimant. A copy of the order, dated and filed in the office of the Deputy…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Associated Indemnity Corporation v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1951
- American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montana Power Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1977
- Rose v. Alaskan Village, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. CalbeckDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
- Sahmaunt v. HorseDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1984
- Daub v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.