Fante v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
It is settled law that the mere appeal of one defendant in compulsory arbitration is of no avail to another defendant, so that a judgment entered after the lapse of appeal time will not be opened or stricken. Flouders v. Foster, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 418, 243 A. 2d 146 (1968). Appellant, therefore, is not entitled to the relief he seeks.
Appellant states that execution on the judgment may subject him to greater liability than the law provides for a joint tort-feasor, if it is determined in the existing appeal that the other tort-feasor had a valid release. The question of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flouders v. FOSTERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Sterrett v. RamsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ottaviano v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Delmarmol v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- OTTAVIANO v. SEPTASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Washik v. CHASESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Maybee v. McKnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.