Legal Opinion

Washik v. CHASE

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1974No. Appeal, 2013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

The issue in this case is a narrow one: In a compulsory arbitration case, 1 where one defendant loses and another wins, what is the effect of an appeal by the defendant who loses so far as the defendant who wins is concerned?

This litigation arose ont of an accident in which an automobile driven by the plaintiff, Leonard Washik, was struck in the rear by a truck. In the first count of his complaint Washik alleged negligence on the part of Ward and Cromie, Inc., the owner of the truck, George Chase, its driver, International Harvester Co., Inc. (appellant), the manufacturer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Klugman v. Gimbel Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Hammerman v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Flouders v. FOSTERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Portock v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Romanovich v. HilfertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ottaviano v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Mitchell v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. OTTAVIANO v. SEPTASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Armstrong v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Berkey v. PuliaficoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API