Legal Opinion

Delmarmol v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1973No. Appeal, No. 906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

Once again we are asked to determine the effect of an appeal by one defendant from the decision of a board of arbitrators in a compulsory arbitration case.1

Plaintiff below had a floater insurance policy with Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, appellant herein, insuring, inter alia, a mink coat. The coat having been lost, plaintiff brought suit against appellant for the insured value of the coat. It appearing from a letter and the pleadings that the plaintiff had pledged the coat as collateral for a bail bond posted on behalf of a friend of hers, the appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klugman v. Gimbel Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Hammerman v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Flouders v. FOSTERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Portock v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Romanovich v. HilfertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ottaviano v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. OTTAVIANO v. SEPTASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Washik v. CHASESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Maybee v. McKnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Armstrong v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API