Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Continental Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1975No. 47,347PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is a declaratory judgment action wherein the parties seek determination whether defendant-appellant Continental Insurance Company’s policy covers plaintiff-appellee Stanley E. Pfannenstiel, including the corresponding duty to defend him in a separate damage action. The trial court dismissed the action and this appeal ensued.

Initially, the parties and their relation to the action should be identified. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company issued its liability policy of insurance on a vehicle owned by Connie E. Pfannenstiel, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Gangel v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. GardinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Nungesser v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Heshion Motors, Inc. v. Western International HotelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Szemanski v. Vulcan Materials Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API