Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Aluminum Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1952No. Civ. 7684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking damages for an alleged patent infringement and an injunction against further infringement. The suit was filed less than a week prior to the expiration of the patent so that the injunction aspect of the case is now moot. Defendants filed an answer raising six defenses, the fifth being that of laches and estoppel.

In conformity with the practice followed by this Court in Banker v. Ford Motor Co., D.C.1933, 3 F.Supp. 737 and approved by the Court of Appeals for this Circuit on appeal of that case, 1934, 69 F.2d 665, this Court, on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodmanse & Hewitt Manuf'g Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Rome Grader & MacHinery Corp. v. J. D. Adams Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Banker v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  4. Holman v. Oil Well Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  5. Banker v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Coatings Corporation v. Metco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. Jenn-Air Products Co. v. Penn Ventilator, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Tiber Laboratories, LLC v. Hawthorn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API