Legal Opinion
Miller v. Department of Human Resources Development
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1974No. Civ. No. 42510PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*170Opinion
COMPTON, J.
Petitioner Evelyn F. Miller appeals from a denial of her petition for writ of mandate by which she sought to compel the California Department of Human Resources Development and specifically the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board to declare her eligible for benefits under the California Unemployment Compensation Law. We affirm the judgment denying the petition.
The facts are not in dispute. Petitioner was employed as a secretary by her son Manuel H. Miller, an attorney, engaged in the private practice of law in Los Angeles, California. Her term of employment was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Medtronic USA v. Cal. Dept. of Tax & Fee Admin.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018