Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 6/14/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE TAMARA SKIDGEL, Plaintiff and Appellant, A151224 v. CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT (Alameda County INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, Super. Ct. No. RG16810609) Defendant and Respondent. The In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 12300 et seq.) provides in-home services to elderly or disabled persons so that they may avoid institutionalization. For purposes of the state unemployment insurance system, IHSS service recipients are considered employers of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.