American Exch. Nat. Bank of New York City v. Ward
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court oí the United States ior the Western District oí Missouri. Prior to March 2!), 1895, tile Martin-Perrin Mercantile Company, hereinafter called the “Mercantile Company,” was doing an extensive business in Kansas City. Mo. It had issued common stock of the face value of $300.-(JOO, and preferred stock of the face value of $150,000. The common stock was held, $150,000 of it by’K. I..
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court oí the United States ior the Western District oí Missouri. Prior to March 2!), 1895, tile Martin-Perrin Mercantile Company, hereinafter called the “Mercantile Company,” was doing an extensive business in Kansas City. Mo. It had issued common stock of the face value of $300.-(JOO, and preferred stock of the face value of $150,000. The common stock was held, $150,000 of it by’K. I.. Martin, its president; $100,000 of it by O. G. Perrin; and $50,000 of it by Tilomas K. Gaines; these three men constituting tiie hoard of directors. Of the preferred stock, $75,000 in…
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, District Judge
The chief question for our determination is whether there was any substantial evidence to support the issue raised by plaintiff in error in the garnishment case. The denial setting forth the facts relied upon to avoid the chattel mortgage and deed of trust, and the brief and argument of counsel for plaintiff in error in treating of the facts of the case, abound in general statements of fraud and fraudulent intent; but a careful and considerate examination of all the evidence discloses substantially the facts recited in the foregoing statement,- ' and those only. It cannot be true that there…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Richardson's v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coleman v. HageySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Stuart v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Jackman v. NewboldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Schemmel v. Hill, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Titlow v. MacPhailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.