Legal Opinion

Garrison v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1925No. 25,727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover on a promissory note. The defenses were that there was no consideration for the note and that it was obtained under duress. The cause was tried to a jury; the court directed a verdict for the defendant; verdict and judgment were rendered accordingly; and the plaintiff appeals.

■> The undisputed- facts disclosed by the evidence were that the defendant had been engaged in business in Leon, Kan., where he became largely indebted and that he turned his mercantile business over to the plaintiff as the representative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Bridge Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Sigler v. SiglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. St. Louis, Ft. Scott & Wichita Railroad v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Robinson v. JacobiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Brooks v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peoples Exchange Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Hudson State Bank v. HaileSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. McGinnis v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Brunhoeber v. BrunhoeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Lorton v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API