Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Dahmen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 21, 1937No. 31,278PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 273 N.W. 364. This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing an appeal from probate court. The question presented for determination is whether or not service of the notice of appeal to the district court from the probate court comes within the prohibition of 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 10933 (6), which prohibits the service of process upon election day.
The notice of appeal from the probate court was served upon the attorney for respondent on election day, November 3, 1936. Service was admitted at respondent's attorney's office, apparently by a clerk or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Joyce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- In Re the Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Malmgren v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Kells v. Nelson-Tenney Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Ross v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Estate of BurtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Andrusick v. City of Apple ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Burton v. JerrelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Riener v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960