Legal Opinion
Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1987No. C6-86-940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
John and Janice Conroy, doing business as Conroy Enterprises, appeal denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial in a contract action. In response to special verdict questions, the jury found appellants breached a contract with Book Automation, Inc. The Conroys argue: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in limiting testimony of their former attorney; (2) errors of fundamental law and controlling principles contained in the jury instructions necessitate a new trial; (3) the special verdict does not disclose the basis for the jury’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hauenstein v. Loctite Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- State v. HohenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Border State Bank of Greenbush v. Bagley Livestock Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- American States Insurance Co. v. AnkrumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002