Legal Opinion

Grisim v. Tapemark Charity Pro-Am Golf Tournament

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1986No. C9-86-706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents TapeMark Company and TapeMark Charity Pro-Am Golf Tournament (TapeMark); Southview Country Club (Southview) and Gene Koe-cheler and dismissed Mary Grisim’s claims arising from an injury she sustained while watching a golf tournament. On appeal, Grisim argues that the trial court erred in finding that primary assumption of the risk was applicable in this case and in applying the same standard of care to the individual golfer, Koecheler, as it applied to Tape-Mark and Southview. We reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Swagger v. City of CrystalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Modec v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grisim v. TapeMark Charity Pro-Am Golf TournamentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Fjerstad v. Heartland Racing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API