John A. Roebling Sons' Co. v. First Nat. Bank
District Court, D. West Virginia
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
The complainant files its bill against the defendants, and prays for an injunction upon two grounds: First, that the defendants are trespassers upon complainant’s property, committing daily acts ot trespass, whereby these acts become a continuous trespass; second, that one of the defendants is a national bank, organized under the national banking laws, which restrain and inhibit it from doing any other business than a legitimate banking business.
As to the first ground; the case made by the bill shows that the New River Coke Company, a corporation doing business in Fayette county, West…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Toledo Novelty Works v. BernheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atherton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Gallin v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Moore v. HallidayOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Paterson & Edey Lumber Co. v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.