Legal Opinion

John A. Roebling Sons' Co. v. First Nat. Bank

District Court, D. West Virginia

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

The complainant files its bill against the defendants, and prays for an injunction upon two grounds: First, that the defendants are trespassers upon complainant’s property, committing daily acts ot trespass, whereby these acts become a continuous trespass; second, that one of the defendants is a national bank, organized under the national banking laws, which restrain and inhibit it from doing any other business than a legitimate banking business.

As to the first ground; the case made by the bill shows that the New River Coke Company, a corporation doing business in Fayette county, West…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Toledo Novelty Works v. BernheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atherton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  2. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gallin v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Moore v. HallidayOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Paterson & Edey Lumber Co. v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API