Legal Opinion

State v. Ty Baker, Sr.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 6, 2017No. 2016-326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEaton, J.

¶ 1. On May 3, 2016, Ty Baker, Sr. pleaded no contest to grossly negligent operation in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1091(b) after his car collided with and totaled another car. Husband and wife owned the car and wife was driving the car when the accident occurred. Following his conviction and a contested restitution hearing, Baker was ordered to pay $828.88, which were lost wages for husband, who was not in the car at the time of the collision. Baker appeals the restitution order, *1096 arguing that husband does not qualify as a "victim" under the restitution statute, that the lost wages were not a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Huggett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Collins v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brianna Marie Peterson v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
  2. State v. Lucas DwightSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. State of Alaska v. Brennan Adam GrubbAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Sita v. StateVermont Superior Court · 2026
  5. State v. . Brittany L. KnightSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API