Estate of Nicholson v. Farmers Insurance
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The Estate of Edward Nicholson, along with 18 other named plaintiffs, filed a putative class action complaint against Farmers and 11 other insurers on September 29, 2006, to recover homeowners insurance benefits allegedly owed for losses incurred in connection with Hurricane Katrina. See Terrebonne v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. 06-4697…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,301 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spence & Green Chemical Company and Andrew Spence, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- John E. Washington v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pousson v. Southern Fidelity Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024
- Ramirez v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024
- Wynn v. Southern Fidelity Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024