Legal Opinion

Plumb v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff in April, 1888, to recover in ejectment the following described premises, which are now occupied and claimed by the city of Grand Rapids as a public park, under the name of “ Orescent Park.” The premises described in the declaration are as follows:

“ That part of lots two (2), three (3), six (6), and seven (7) of block twenty-three (23) of Dexter fraction of the city of Grand Rapids, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying east and north of the westerly and southerly line of a certain street running through said lots, called ‘Crescent Street;’ also a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. County of Wayne v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Baker v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Palmer v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cudahy Bros. v. West Michigan Dock & Market Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Michigan v. Jackson, L. & S. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Grix v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Middleton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Walton v. HymansMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API