Legal Opinion
Hajnas v. Engelhard Min. & Chem. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 13, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
231 N.J. Super. 353 (1989)
555 A.2d 716
ETHEL HAJNAS NOW KNOWN AS ETHEL SUGALSKI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
ENGELHARD MINERAL & CHEMICAL CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.[1]
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 7, 1989.
Decided March 13, 1989.
Before Judges O'BRIEN, SCALERA and STERN.
Francis T. Guiliano argued the cause for appellant (Mattson, Madden and Polito, attorneys; Francis T. Guiliano, of counsel and on the brief).
Allan S. Goldberger argued the cause for respondent (Goldberger and Seligsohn, attorneys; Allan S. Goldberger, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States Casualty Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Estelle v. Board of Education of Borough of Red BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Riccioni v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Handleman v. Marwen Stores Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- 4934, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lister v. JB Eurell Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Frappier v. Eastern Logistics, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Sentinel Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Earthworks Landscape Construction. LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Montgomery v. Abex Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.