Legal Opinion

State v. Michelle Faye McIntosh

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2016No. 41910PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Michelle Faye McIntosh appeals from her judgment of conviction and resulting sentence after she was found guilty of trafficking in methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, two counts of delivery of methamphetamine, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm both the judgment of conviction and the resulting sentence.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This ease stems out of three separate purchases of methamphetamine by an undercover police officer from Michelle Faye McIntosh. The undercover police officer first purchased 3.5…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bach v. BagleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Rome v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. BarrIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. Patrick James BaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. MatthewsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API